NRA “School Shield” Report…Just More Mercenary NRA Advertising

school-bus-newtown

The Friends of the NRA released their School Shield report today. If you believe it has evolved from the original post Sandy Hook tone deaf “The only way to stop a bad man with a gun is a good man with a gun” message from NRA talking head Wayne LaPierre you will be sorely disappointed.

You will also find that all twelve members of the task force are from law enforcement and security, none from education and five of those members are from RBT Solutions, a for profit security training group which would likely profit from their recommendations.

There is an old adage that says “If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”

To the report and its finding. The report is linked so you can read each and every word of it, but let’s summarize the 10 findings and 10 recommendations.

The Findings…

Finding No. 1: There has been insufficient attention paid to school security needs in our nation, and the greatest security gap falls within the medium- to smaller-size schools, which do not have the level of resources of the larger school districts.

In addition, another gap identified by the assessment teams sent out by the National School Shield Task Force is that older schools, constructed more than ten years ago, have greater security challenges than newer facilities. More recently designed schools have more architectural attention devoted to security features in contrast to the building design and layout of older facilities.

Finding No. 2: Many schools do not have a formal, written security plan, and even for those that do, they are often either inadequate or not properly exercised.

Finding No. 3: A properly trained armed school officer, such as a school resource officer, has proven to be an important layer of security for prevention and response in the case of an active threat on a school campus.

Finding No. 4: Local school authorities are in the best position to make a final decision on school safety procedures, specifically whether an armed security guard is necessary and supported by the education and citizen community.

Finding No. 5: Many public and non-public schools are financially unable to include armed security personnel as part of the school security plan and have resorted to school staff carrying firearms in order to provide an additional level of protection for the students and staff in the event of a violent incident on school property.

Finding No. 6: While the local school leadership should make all final decisions regarding the elements of the school security plan, the individual states, with few exceptions, have not made school security an element of adequacy in school standards.

Finding No. 7: School officials are not generally trained in security assessments or the development of comprehensive safety and security plans. Ideally, a school retains professional assistance in developing their school security plans; however, there is a compelling need for professional-quality online self-assessment tools.

Finding No. 8: Federal funding for the personnel costs of SROs has served as a pathway for increased security in our schools, but federal funding has proved unreliable as a long-term solution to the school safety and security needs of our nation.

Finding No. 9: There are numerous federal agencies and programs that provide valuable school safety resources; however, there is a lack of coordination between the federal agencies resulting in gaps, duplication and inefficiencies.

Finding No. 10: History teaches us that in most violent attacks at a school, there are multiple early warning signs, called pre-incident indicators, of a student or outside person who exhibits threatening behavior and poses a risk to the school.

To summarize…Schools haven’t paid attention to security, older schools are harder to secure, armed security is a must, there isn’t enough funding, schools can’t make their own security assessments and, did I mention armed security is a must and there isn’t enough funding.

So, you need armed guards and someone to tell you what to do and you don’t have reasonable  funding. Should I also point out that the authors of the report train armed guards and law enforcement and do security assessments? Win-Win for the consultants.

The Recommendations…

No. 1: Training A model-training program has been developed by the NSS Task Force for the professional training of armed personnel in the school environment.

This training will only be open to those who are designated by school officials and qualified by appropriate background investigation, testing and relevant experience.

No. 2: Adoption of Model Law for Armed School Personnel Many states prohibit anyone other than a sworn law-enforcement officer or licensed security guard to carry a firearm in a public or non-public school. In order for a selected school staff member to be designated, trained and armed on school property, the states will have to change current legal restrictions.

No. 3: School Resource Officer Each school that employs an SRO should have a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), or an “interagency agreement,” between the appropriate law-enforcement agency and the school district. This contract should define the duties and responsibilities of the SRO, as well as the applicable laws, rules and regulations.

No. 4: Online Self-Assessment Tool An internet-based self-assessment tool has been created to allow any school (whether public, private or parochial) to have secure access to comprehensively evaluate and assess the security gaps and vulnerabilities of each school.

No. 5: State Education Adequacy Requirement State standards related to school security vary from non-existent to stringent. Although state responses to school security will naturally vary, there should be a common element that requires all public schools to participate in an assessment and develop a security plan based on the unique requirements of that particular institution.

No. 6: Federal Coordination and Funding Either through legislation or executive action, a lead agency should be designated to coordinate the federal programs and funding of local school safety efforts. The Department of Homeland Security should be designated as the lead, supported by the Department of Education and Department of Justice.

No. 7: Umbrella National Organization to Advocate and Support School Safety. Because of the limitations of federal, state and local funding for school safety, there is an important role that can be filled by a private non-profit advocacy and education organization. The National School Shield is in a position with adequate funding and support from the NRA to fulfill this important national mission.

The NSS mission would: (a) provide national advocacy for school safety; (b) supply ongoing online self-assessment and other tools for public, private and parochial schools; (c) make available best practices in school safety to help guide schools in the development of school safety and security policies; (d) fund innovative pilot projects and training costs for armed school personnel; and (e) provide state-of-the-art training programs in the area of school safety and security.

No. 8: Specific Pilot Program on Threat Assessments and Mental Health. As part of its comprehensive security plan, each school should develop a threat assessment team, which will work in coordination with mental health professionals.

To summarize…The NRA funded study suggests more guns in schools, training by NRA supported businesses, security consulting by NRA supported businesses and there should be an umbrella organization that is, conveniently funded by NRA, change state laws to accommodate recommendations. In other words, this 225 page report is nothing more than a sales pitch for the NRA and its business partners.

One of the recommendations…No. 2, Adoption of Model Law for Armed School Personnel is a demand from the NRA to change state legislation to conform to the NEW NRA recommendations, erasing legislation such as the Safe School Act of 1999 that was championed by the NRA.

“First, we believe in absolutely gun-free, zero-tolerance, totally safe schools. That means no guns in America’s schools, period … with the rare exception of law enforcement officers or trained security personnel.” Wayne LaPierre, 1999

“If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail”

The report makes it very clear that a guard in schools will eliminate the threats to students…but only glosses over the reality of Columbine…there was a trained security officer on site.

It also fails to address the events like the very recent kidnapping off a school bus in Alabama or the Chowchilla School Bus Hijacking in 1976 where buried in a quarry.

Further it doesn’t take into account events like the school shooting in Westside Middle School where, in 1998 five were killed and 10 wounded by students who set up a sniper position across from the school.

Put simply, this “Call for Action” from the NRA only takes into account in school events and its solution is to fortify schools.

Now, let’s look at the numbers. There are over 98,000 public schools in the United States, another 33,000 private schools and the 5,000 or so colleges.

IF a school building has just ONE security officer, and that officer is paid $35,000 per year, school boards and county sheriffs are going to have to come up with $3,400,000,000 per year in school districts and counties that are already laying off teachers and deputy sheriffs and police officers due to lack of tax revenue. Federal funds for COPS and CIS programs have been removed from the federal budget by Congress. And that $3.4Billion does not account for training, certification or school security assessments – which would have to be done every couple of years.  And it further doesn’t include the enhanced physical requirements that this report demands.

Now to a humorous, ironic part of this report. Back in December 2012 the NRA emphatically said that we should not have a knee-jerk reaction to the shootings at a elementary school, yet their entire proposal revolves around a shooting at a school…ignoring the dozen other mass shootings in 2012, from theaters to churches to malls to restaurants. And it certainly doesn’t address the other 10,000 killed by gun violence each year.

And one other thing…did you catch the part in the Recommendations that the Department of Homeland Security should be in charge?  These are the same folks who now run TSA.  And did I mention that five of the Task Force were/are part of Department of Homeland Security…

So, of the 12 members of the NRA advertisement masquerading as a “Call for Action”…five are part of the organization they want running things and five are from a private security company that recommends training and assessments.

Hammer Nail

 

______________________________________________________

McAllister is a life long liberal, environmentalist, Eagle Scout, and even gun owner – born in Harlan, Kentucky and has lived in Southern California, New York City and now resides in Lexington, Kentucky as a Systems Analyst.

Advertisements

7 responses to “NRA “School Shield” Report…Just More Mercenary NRA Advertising

  • Nelson Horton

    Well…what are your suggestions for making it safe for children in our schools ? Or do you have any at all ?? The NRA has excellent training courses in the use of firearms…and they are widely used…and have been for many years.

  • Nelson Horton

    Moderation or censorship ??

    • mcallisterbryant

      I just walked in the door…hard to moderate when I am not at a computer.

      To your first question…there are lots of things that can be done to keep kids safe in schools, as well as theaters, malls, restaurants and other public and private places. Previous articles list some.

      Yes, NRA does have some good training at the range…I took it back in the mid 1960s. But the point of this article was that the entire solution set revolved around profit making ventures for NRA and their corporate donors. That taints the validity of the study.

      Also, they gave no solutions to address the $10Billion PLUS that would be required to pay for the implementation of even part of this “solution”.

  • Nelson Horton

    Okay….our law enforcement personnel are now believed to be under seige by the Mexican Drug Cartel…assassinations in Texas area and now in West Virginia. The people targeted were prosecuting drug cases. The Citizens of Mexico are now forming vigilante groups to protect their towns, their families and themselves…using any weapons they can find. This is all the more reason why every able bodied person in the USA should own a personal weapon today….and know when and where it can be legally used.
    The more people that are trained by the NRA, the better off our Nation will be in the future. Guns in the hands of responsibile people is a good thing…in our world today.
    Those who are “bunkers” over gun control need to shift their emphasis to controlling mentally unstable people…who, if they become violent, will find a weapon of some kind…somewhere. All the mass shooters have been mentally ill…and the weapons they have used to attack others has run the range of most all implements that will cause physical injuries. Further, we need to concentrate upon the causes of mental illness…and there are indeed many. Pornography, narcotics, violent video games and violent movies and wide spread disolution of marriages and that have small children in the families. Young people are left with little to guide them with the break up of the normal family on such a large scale.
    Thank you. Tenton Nelson Horton, Order of Humanity

    • mcallisterbryant

      Well, the shootings in Texas and Colorado are not really focused on a single potential shooter motive. The three main theories right now are Aryan Brotherhood – a white supremacist group, drug cartels, and former embezzlement prosecutions.

      As for “Pornography, narcotics, violent video games and violent movies and wide spread disolution of marriages and that have small children in the families.”, Europe has the same group of “moral triggers” yet they don’t have 1/100th of the violence we have. Gotta be something else.

      As for “Guns in the hands of responsibile people is a good thing”…sure, how are YOU going to define “responsible”? And how many of those “responsible” people are perfectly responsible until the very moment they are not.

  • Nelson Horton

    Thank you for your reply, Mcallister. Yes, there are always many sides to any problem. Most of the people who train others in the use of guns seem to be affiliated with the NRA. Yes, they will make a profit more than likely.
    But, if they were not there, then we would have no “training agency” at all…it would seem.

    Yes, selling guns is big business and the NRA is influenced by the gun merchants for sure. However, the alternative of not doing anything to protect our school children is pretty bad….and would leave them with no protection. Our government requires the presence of Children at our Public Schools….so the government is legally obligated to make schools a safe place for our Children…no matter the cost.
    We try not to send coal miners into unsafe coal mines…we must also try not to send our children to unsafe schools. We spend millions of dollars to send military “shows of force” to places like the Middle East and the Korean Area. Are our Children entitled to any less protection ???? The money to make our schools safe is available, surely….as our Government just made it possible for people with no credit at all to buy new cars…with loans backed by the government. It is all about priorities.

    The recent efforts for “gun control” have resulted in most all gun shops and manufacturers of guns selling out most every weapon that they had in stock.. If one checks gun catalogs on line, for most any type of weapons for sale, they will see notices by most guns manufactured that say, “Out of Stock”. The result is that there are now more, many more, guns owned by private citizens than ever before here in the USA.

    The real answer seems to be finding and eliminating the causes of so very much mental illness in societies all over the world. Unfortunately, our Congress seems to have paid little attention to this at all.

    We both seek the very same thing…an end to violence. It is good that we can talk together. Two heads are better than one.

    Thank you for posting my messages. All the best to you. Tenton

    • mcallisterbryant

      To one point…it was not gun control legislation efforts that emptied gun stores…it was panic buying and hoarding by those who insist that “Obama gonna git r guns”, though the 40 bills before congress and the 20 executive orders by the white house say nothing at all about taking guns.

      Gun enthusiasts did it to themselves. Which is why I can’t find 22 ammo – the very last type that would ever be considered banned or confiscated. Yet you can’t find it anywhere.

      FYI, go back and look at this article I wrote…it will explain that I don’t come at this from a “gun grabber” perspective.

      https://shootfromthelefthip.com/2013/03/04/a-liberal-gun-owners-view-from-50-years-of-shooting/

      Thanks again for visiting…I appreciate the differing opinions…it is the only way we learn.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: